CIA DID NOT FAIL - THE U.S. WAS DECEIVED INTO THE IRAQ WAR
NEW YORK - Having presided over the two worst intelligence disasters since Pearl Harbor – 9/11 and the misbegotten invasion of Iraq – the Bush Administration and its apologists are now whining, `OK, we were wrong about Iraq’s weapons and supposed threat, but so was everybody else. Besides, it was all CIA’s fault.’
No so. The Iraq weapons fiasco was absolutely not caused by an `intelligence failure,’ as the White House and the recent Senate whitewash claim. It was not an understandable mistake made by all, as a rigged British `inquiry’ concluded.
US national security and CIA were corrupted and blinded by extremist ideology, cowardice, and careerism. The failure at CIA was not of the organization, but its leadership.
Nor was everyone wrong about Iraq. The UN’s arms inspectors (those that were not spies for the US and Israel) declared Iraq had no wmd’s. Scores of Mideast professionals, this writer included, insisted from Day 1 that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, posed no threat to the USA, and had no link to al-Qaida. The Bush Administration had documents confirming destruction in 1992 of all of Iraq’s chemical and biological weapons (supplied by the US and Britain for use against Iran).
Britain’s Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, had the courage and integrity to resign in protest over Tony Blair’s rush to join the Bush Administration in a trumped-up war.
Here’s what really happened. In 2002, Cheney thundered that Iraq was seeking nuclear weapons. A month later, Secretary Colin Powell proclaimed `no doubt he (Saddam) has chemical weapons.’ Shortly after, President George Bush assured the UN that Iraq had biological weapons.
National Insecurity Advisor Condoleeza Rice warned a `mushroom cloud’ threatened America. Britain’s glib prime minister, Tony Blair, made similar ludicrous claims.
Many veteran CIA officers dismissed these alarms as politically-motivated propaganda. The US State Department, Air Force, and French intelligence challenged claims Iraq had threatening offensive weapons systems. Many senior Pentagon military officers opposed invading Iraq.
But the word went out: Now hear this. If you value your job and pension, do not, repeat, do not contradict the boss.
The president is hell-bent on invading Iraq. Make it so.
Cheney repeatedly visited CIA, intimidating staff and demanding evidence be found of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction and links to al-Qaida. Oblivious to all facts, Cheney keeps warning Iraq still threatens the USA. He appears increasingly out of touch with reality.
CIA director George Tenet, a political apartchik, not an intelligence professional, undermined his agency’s ethics by eagerly pandering to all of Bush and Cheney’s prejudices – over his subordinate’s protests. Careerism and hand-licking took precedence over professionalism. Those with dissenting views were ignored, shunted aside, or fired.
This column has long reported smoldering anger among veteran CIA officers over Bush’s deeply flawed policies towards Iraq and the Muslim World. In late 2001, I was shocked and horrified to hear a distinguished member of CIA’s founding families actually claim a `fifth column’ had taken control of Iraq policy and was driving the US to war.
But even the obsequious Tenet failed to satisfy Bush and Cheney’s growing demands for more damning `evidence,’ so Cheney and Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld created two independent intelligence units, Office for Special Plans, and `Team B,’ packing them with far-right neoconservative militarists from the Wolfowitz, Feith, Perle faction. Their mission: find the smoking guns to justify immediate war against Iraq.
These two intelligence units became the main conduits for disinformation about Iraq, confirming every rumor or lie the White House and media wanted to believe, no matter how absurd.
Iraq-exile Ahmad Chalabi, created, financed, and managed by Pentagon neocons, was the main lie-producer. His tales were trumpeted by the White House and media. Israeli and British intelligence provided more faked material to whip up war fever.
This was no intelligence failure. This was strategic deception, a combination the Soviets KGB called `disinformatzia’ and `maskirovka.’ This was facilitated by an ideologically and religiously extreme president; a Dr Strangelovian vice president lusting for war and oil; neocon ideologues determined to advance the Greater Israel cause of PM Ariel Sharon; and a cowardly Congress that gravely violated its most basic responsibility to the nation by giving President Bush a blank check to go to war. And a national security establishment that lacked the cojones to tell superiors or Americans the truth.
Purging CIA is not the answer. If anyone should be held accountable, it is the politicians and neocons in the Pentagon and media, who willfully misled the US into a catastrophic war that has so far cost the lives of over 880 Americans, 13,000 Iraqi civilians, US $200 billion, and ruined the good name of the United States around the world.
They and Britain’s Tony Blair must not be allowed to escape full blame and retribution by hiding behind the sophistry that everyone – and thus no one- was responsible.
Posted by Eric Margolis on July 19, 2004 12:26 PM
Comments:
Please continue to speak the truth, over and over and over and over again until it sticks. Because it will.
Please try and organize a group of fearless mid-east professionals who can defend themselves against the strategic lies of the SSCI.
Posted by Howard Beale at July 19, 2004 04:58 PM
There is very little doubt as to who is to be held responsible for engaging in this illegal Iraq War…this administration. However, a pre-emtive strike wouldn’t have been possible if the Congress had not relinquished it’s power to a ‘war crazed’ president, allowing him the ability to declare war at his discression. This was a violation of our own constitution and those in Congress who voted to grant that power should be brought up on charges of treason. By the way, Mr. Kerry was one of those congressmen who willingly gave Bush the OK. Should make you consider if the saying, “the lesser of two evils is still evil” can be applied to the parties involved in the up coming presidential elections.
Posted by True Peace at July 20, 2004 09:55 AM
You have a great imagination Eric. Tall tales are hard to prove aren’t they.
Posted by MDRose at July 27, 2004 02:38 PM
A devil’s advocate question: regardless of how or why the U.S. ended up in Iraq, is it perhaps a good thing anyway?
In post-WWI Europe, the US decided that the Russians should solve their own problems rather than intervene - and ended up with “Uncle Joe”, the most genocidal maniac in history (40-45 million, depending on which figures you believe). He dwarfs Hitler, Ghenghis Khan, and Julius Caesar put together.
Sooo, perhaps it was a good thing in this case to get rid of Saddam rather than letting him spread his horror? I guess it could be if we can believe that G.W.B. manages to replace him with someone better … a rather huge leap of faith.
Only the American people can really decide for themselves if Iraq was worth it, because the real war on terror is still waiting for them when they’re done there - bin Laden & the Al Quaeda financiers, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Sudan, Somalia, Egypt, Pakistan, …etc.
Posted by JonnyBoy0416 at August 19, 2004 11:23 AM
No one, no matter how bad Saddam was, ought to think because we’re rid of Saddam that the death by deprivation of 100,000 children through 10 years of sanctions and then bombing the smiterines out of a once beautiful city and country, leaving the living to contend with unexploded (until they play with these brightly coloured toy-like items) cluster bombs, depleted uranium that is truly poisoning and killing many many more, is worth it. Its not like we have democracy there (nor in the US where every vote in bought - its a corporatocracy). If you try to justify invasion on the basis that the Iraqis are better off without Saddam, go visit Iraq. And be ready to tell mass murderer Bush and his evil clan, esp. puppetmaster Wolfowitch, that what they did was right. Hell is a hot place, radioactively hot, just like they made Baghdad and the rest of Iraq.
Posted by ghawley at June 3, 2005 12:54 PM
CIA = Corrupt Interlink Apparatchik
Posted by Salamscion at September 25, 2005 05:07 PM