ROGUE REPUBLICAN
New York, October 27, 2008
I’ve been called a lot of things in my times, but never a liberal Democrat - until recently. In American political argot, `liberal’ means leftwing.
But some of my bigwig Republican pals in California have been accusing me of having become a liberal because of my criticism of Calamity George Bush and my evident lack of enthusiasm for Sen. John McCain’s Republicans.  
 
As a lifelong Republican, I am more  likely to become a Seventh Day Adventist or Rosicrucian than a liberal Democrat!
 
Call me a rogue Republican. 
 
I’ve always been a moderate, conservative Eisenhower Republican who believes in small government, low taxes, saving, hard work, individual freedoms, and avoiding overseas adventures. 
 
As a child, I saw President Dwight Eisenhower’s inauguration in Washington and treasure the memory to this day.  For me, Eisenhower was the embodiment of America’s finest qualities: courage, honesty, honor, human decency, modesty and plain speaking. 
 
I’ve said it before and say it again: I like Ike.  When Eisenhower was president, America was respected and admired around the non-Communist world. 
 
I respect and admire Republican candidate Sen. John McCain and believe he would make a fine president.  But he showed terrible judgment in picking Sarah Palin as vice presidential running mate, and by  surrounding himself with neocon advisors like Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Randy  Scheunemann, Elliot Abrams and other extremists who played a major role in creating the frightful foreign affairs mess the US now faces. They have made America hated around the globe.
 
Equally bad, today’s Republicans are no longer a party of the democratic center.   After the 9/11 attacks,  Bush and Dick Cheney packed their administration with rabid neocon warmongers who drove the nation and Republican Party so far right it flirted at times with fascism.  
 
When I hear `Republican’ these days, the words that come to my mind are:  arrogance, ignorance, and just plain dumbness. 
 
Religious fundamentalists have become the bedrock of the Bush presidency.  Today, 44-50% of Republican voters call themselves born-again Christian fundamentalists who believe every word of the Bible is true.  Their most urgent foreign policy goal is to recreate Biblical Israel so their Messiah can return and destroy the planet.   American supporters of Israel’s hard right Likud Party have made an alliance with these religious fundamentalists. 
 
That is no longer my party. The Grand Old Republican Party of Lincoln, Eisenhower, and Reagan has been hijacked by America’s rural heartland and the southern-fried Bible Belt.   The Republican Party no longer primarily speaks for most educated, worldly city-dwelling Americans.    
 
McCain’s choice of an evangelical Christian ultra conservative, Gov. Sarah Palin, a woman of stunning vulgarity and ignorance, is testimony to the dumbing down of the party and its transformation into a populist religious movement.  But he may have had to do so. Without Palin, many on the Christian right would not have even voted, assuring defeat for McCain.
 
Note to friends and critics:  I haven’t changed my politics and remain firmly in the center.  But the Republican Party has lurched so far to the right that the old center looks like the left to many Republicans. 
 
Barack Obama is dead wrong to propose raising taxes or sending more troops to Afghanistan, an ignoble conflict he mislabels `the good war.’  But he is no socialist, as Palin charges.  Nationalizing the nation’s banks is socialist.  Urging world domination is National Socialist.  Raising taxes for the wealthy is not socialist, just  a Democratic shibboleth that has been proven counterproductive time and again. 
 
Republicans disgraced the nation by all their lies about Iraq, endorsing torture, assassinations,  Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, secret prisons, kidnapping, kangaroo courts, spying on US citizens and undermining America’s Constitution. Too many cowardly Democrats joined this lynch mob.   Such vile behavior made me ashamed to call myself an American.
 
Republicans now speak for many rich fat cats, the military-industrial-petroleum complex, and some of the least educated, most backwards, most prejudiced Americans.    McCain and Palin have shamelessly stoked   anti-black, anti-Muslim and anti-foreign hatred and fear among them during this campaign.  So, too, did Hilary Clinton.
 
Gen. Colin Powell did the right thing by breaking with John McCain, denouncing racism and Islamophobia, and warning of the party’s lurch to the far right.  However, I wish he had also come clean re all the lies about Iraq he delivered at the UN.  The good general still owes us an explanation.
 
America desperately needs a reborn, moderate Republican Party freed from narrow-minded religious ideology and ruralism that will return the nation to its former democratic values and decency. This was the United States the world used to respect. 
 
If Obama wins office, I hope he will remember the sterling example set by President Eisenhower.  I hope he also remembers Ben Franklin’s maxim that there is no such thing as a good war, or a bad peace.
cleesburg
Monday, October 27, 2008 3:20 PM
Eric, another excellent piece! I am the type of moderate Republican you identify with. Yes it has to be reborn.
Market Socialist
Monday, October 27, 2008 5:29 PM
The Republican Party started to veer into the direction of a theocratic movement with President Reagan. Now, the party has come full circle with Christian and Jewish Mullahs beating the war drum against the Shiite Mullahs.

As for the Military, Petroleum and Financial Complex (notice that I have left out Industrial because it has been out sourced to China), read “Free Lunch” by Dave Cay Johnston.

I too am a moderate and believe that the time will come in America where a centrist political party will evolve through this polarized garbage that we see now. This can not happen too soon.

Cheers

Truth
Monday, October 27, 2008 7:18 PM
Well said Eric, it's nice to see there are still some people that remember what made this country great!
Rob Paine
Monday, October 27, 2008 8:22 PM
Mr Margolis
This is one of the best pieces I've read in years about what's happened to the Republicans. I consider myself fairly liberal, but I voted for G H W Bush in 1988. Although I'm not necessarily proud of that, at the time I felt he represented America better than Gov Dukakis (key phrase "at the time"). What we have today has nothing to do with Eisenhower, I man I hold in great esteem. The party has been perverted by the ultra right religious faction, a group of folks that have no basis in reality (ie: our founding fathers were Christian conservatives, bible thumping people). These groups have not only taken down the Republican party but almost the accepted notion that the United States is a free, freedom loving, welcomer of all peoples nation. They are no better than any religious based fanaticism. No matter how dedicated you are to you religious beliefs, what we have today in the United States is national disgrace. And being a student of history I'm sure President Eisenhower would have wholly agreed.
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Monday, October 27, 2008 11:49 PM
Eric:You might not agree-But in Canada I think these nice values "For me, Eisenhower was the embodiment of America’s finest qualities: courage, honesty, honor, human decency, modesty and plain speaking. " you espouse along with many of us are most closely represented by Liberal party, or are more likely to be represented by the middle/moderate party-
Now the question is how do you get rid of neocon-inspired Harper and restore moderation to Canada?
LINCOLNSHIRE POACHER
Sunday, November 02, 2008 2:41 AM
Not with Laughing stock Dion, his "green" nonsensical obsession. Fine time to cripple Canada's economy with that fairytale. Dalton Mcguinty should do a rethink of his plans to close Ontario's 5 coal plants, with industry failing and closure announcements a daily event, a possible %60 rise in electricity rates is just what we need. Especially with all the feel good, good it will do with China , India and the United States having 860 coal plants on the books to be built in the next 3 years. Any reductions will be made up by the rest of the world in less than 2 days. In 5 days just by the 3 above countries. It may result in an increase in emissions if the fleeing manufacturing moves to China powered almost exclusively by coal. Wonder why nobody ever raises this reality in debate. National poverty plan, to delay global warming disaster by a few days. Agree that Harper should remove our troops sooner than later but if I remember right your Liberal people from the times of "moderation" are the ones who put us in that mess. ( I shouldn't say us, I mean our misused soldiers who are doing the dying and killing) Chretien took a long time to decide on Iraq also. But am thankful that the old crook didn't
Market Socialist
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:31 AM
A point of clarification please. The Conservative Party of Canada is not Neo - Con in nature. In fact they are closer in philosophy to the US Democratic Party than to the Republican Party. I agree that some issues like Afghanistan, the Conservatives have sung the same tune as other NATO Allies, but Neo-Cons they are not.
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 2:49 AM
Sorry, I do not agree with you-The support base of Harper are the right-wing zealots, much like their cousins to the south-simply they are not so much vocal-due to what I call Canadian Damping effect[using physics terminology, you can dampen the motion of mass attached to spring which is in simple harmonic motion by considering friction for example]-In any case from practical point of view, Harper's World View is almost the same as Bush, which is coupled to the unholy alliance that Eric has talked about in this article-Moreover it is a well-known fact That THE US Foreign Policy[ with which most of us are subjected to] DOES NOT CHANGE WHETHER DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN IT IS DICTATED BY USA INTEREST-WHICH TO PUT IT SIMPLY IS TO GRAB ALL THE RESOURCES IF YOU CAN SINCE THAT BEST SERVES USA NATIONAL INTEREST-WHY ELSE THEY WOULD WANT PROJECT THEIR MILITARY MUSCLE WHEN OTHER METHODS [which are not too subtle] do not work, like isolating countries they term as rogue by economic and other means?
Desoc
Saturday, November 01, 2008 12:24 AM
?????????? You must be kidding! The old PC (Progressive Conservative Party of Canada) was not run by neocons, was a lot less right-wing than the present Conservative Party, but even IT was miles away from the Democratic Party. The Dems are way too beholding to big$$$ and they certainly aren't the Dems of the 30s and 40s, but they still have close ties to labour, women's groups, and other advocacy groups generally associated with the left. Even the Liberal Party of Canada never had those associations: that's the balliwick of the NDP, which is obviously to the left of the Dems in the US.

But the present Conservative Party of Canada is deeply neo-con. You don't have to be a political junky, nor have any more research skills than required for Google or Wiki to trace the deep neo-con roots of the Reform, turned Alliance, turned Conservative Party. Sure it amalgamated with the PCs, but all the PCs had left at the time was a proud history, a badly deteriorated national organizational base (with old lists, etc.), and some diehard members who would rather lean to the right than left with the Liberals­.

But the Reform/Alliance that swallowed up the PCs had/has all the members, the money, the MPs, and the deeply right-wing, neo-con philosophy. And their philosophy straight-forwardly dominates the party. The old PCers are voices in the wilderness at this point inside the CP. How you could want to comment here and not be aware of that is....??????

The CP now pushes the very same policies as present Republicans--anti-abortion; war-mongering over diplomacy; pro military buildup; in bed with oil companies; against Kyoto and in denial about climate change; deep tax cuts for the rich; reducing the size of gov't ridiculously and handing it over to business; law and order; for capital punishment; etc., etc., etc.,

The old Republican party (Eisenhower Repubs) was very different from the present neo-con dominated crew. They believed in small gov't, but not at all the give-it-all-to-business policies of the neo-cons. In fact, Eisenhower's wise, ringing caution about the military-industrial complex (which thrives frighteningly well under the neo-cons) was all about not surrendering control of defence away from the people's government, and into the hands of interested people and organizations (generals, arms manufacturers, etc.) who have a vested interest in exaggerating threats, the need for war, the need for more, bigger, nastier weapons, etc. And the old GOP believed deeply in government not meddling in people's private business, which is why most true conservatives don't believe in prohibition (booze or drugs) and why Barbara Bush simply says about abortion that it's "a woman's choice(!)...not for the government to decide". That's a conservative speaking. The US neo-cons (including her simpleton son, obviously) and Canada's Harper and his Reform (and Harris) bunch are all deeply in favour of making abortion illegal, if only they could.

"...sung the same tune as other NATO allies...!!???? Harper has totally, straightforwardly said: "Me too" to everything Bush has said or done. Canada has absolutely no foreign policy at all; whatever Bush and his gang says, that's it...on the election of Hamas; the war in Lebanon, the invasion of Iraq (Harper and his CP cronies made fun of the Liberals and insulted them crudely for not going along); Guantanamo; torture; etc., etc.,

Obviously with a minority gov't, they haven't been able to show their true colours, but the neo-conishness of the CP is still obvious to anybody who pays minimum attention to Canadian politics­.

Methinks you have some reading to do.
LINCOLNSHIRE POACHER
Sunday, November 02, 2008 3:15 AM
Are all these things bad, reducing size of government??? Do you know how fat it has become, fingers in everything, years and miles of artificial red tape attached to everything, to justify thousands of civil servants in offices somewhere feeding off of itself. Ottawa, a city of 1 million and much of hull only exists because of government, it would be a little village otherwise. In a country of 30 million. Law and order?? My cousin was stabbed to death when he arrived home at the wrong time in the middle of a b+e. The culprit went to jail for 3 years and a bit, he managed to cry enough that he is too young etc etc to go to jail for long, judge felt for him and it worked, 3 weeks after he was out stole a car and stabbed the owner severly in the process. (he lived) back to jail and is probably back out again or may have stabbed more people?? He had a record prior to murdering my cousin that made everyone wonder why he wasn't already in prison. For people who have dealt with frustrating issues like this, tougher law and order sounds like a good thing. Or maybe I am even more terrible than him for thinking this, a barbarian.!! There are a few who would like to lock up every little kid that steals a candy bar and they get a lot of attention, there are some real problems with the way violent crimes are dealt with.
Jan WIklund
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:28 AM
George Orwell once said about the dupes that ran Britain in the 20s and 30s that they had to become stupid to avoid knowing where their income came from. I suppose that when the US becomes an ordinary country - admittedly one of the bigger ones, but not one that can live from bullying the others - it will again become intelligent.
Shibboleth
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 12:47 PM
Yes, many of us are Eisenhower Republicans. Are you not worried about the massive redistribution of money from working people to nonworkers, as proposed by Obama?
Big Perk
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 2:59 PM
I'm a newly self-admited liberal. It's very liberating, I have to admit.

One question, Eric... So what are we to do about Afghanistan if we don't send in more troops? I too hope that Obama will develop a better tax regime while he's in office and turn away from school yard bullying to prove America's dominance. However, I have to disagree with you on Afghanistan. That is a righteous war. I was in the military when everything kicked off and I was more than ready to head for Kabul. Conversely, I flatly refused to go to Bagdhad because that was unrighteous. If we don't do anything about Afghanistan which has gotten completely out of control, then what should we do?
Hawk
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:49 PM
Perk:

The fact that you would refer to any war as 'righteous' is scary enough it itself. However, Afghanistan wasn't even a necessary war. Like Iraq, Afghanistan is all about control of oil. The U.S. government already had plans to attack Afghanistan even before 9/11.
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 2:58 AM
I agree with Hawk-Big Perk Who are you to declare That it is a Righteous War-If your family would be killed for example as many afghans have been simply for standing for their RIGHTS TO BE, You will never call it a Righteous War! Unfortunately We allow ourselves to be dictated by Hypocrisy and Propaganda instead of Realizing That We are All Human, and Think Compassionately Even if we disagree-Anyways You can read Eric Margolis article about the Control of TAPI-As Hawk has indicated IT IS ALL ABOUT CONTROL TO PUT IT IN A CORRECT PERSPECTIVE AND BROAD BIG PICTURE-
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 2:59 AM
Big Perk Who are you to declare That it is a Righteous War-If your family would be killed for example as many afghans have been simply for standing for their RIGHTS TO BE, You will never call it a Righteous War! Unfortunately We allow ourselves to be dictated by Hypocrisy and Propaganda instead of Realizing That We are All Human, and Think Compassionately Even if we disagree-Anyways You can read Eric Margolis article about the Control of TAPI-As Hawk has indicated IT IS ALL ABOUT CONTROL TO PUT IT IN A CORRECT PERSPECTIVE AND BROAD BIG PICTURE-
Desoc
Saturday, November 01, 2008 2:10 AM
Get a map of Afghanistan with US bases on it, and another one with the proposed oil pipeline on it. OMG! They perfectly match. The US is in Afghanistan to secure the territory for the pipeline; no security, no pipeline (to deliver oil and gas from the Caspian Basin to Pakistan, India, etc.)

The Bush administration loved the Taliban as long as the pipeline was on.
LINCOLNSHIRE POACHER
Sunday, November 02, 2008 3:33 AM
The Afghan war sure seems less righteous when half the country is starving and another cold winter ahead, with the BBC showing dozens of children admitted to a small clinic shown naked their bottoms and everywhere else there should be some fat shriveled up like a prune starving to death, and sunken eyes not knowing what to do if more are admitted. Feel good crap that some girls can go to school and not wear the burka. These things should be put to a scale of atrocity. I figure all but the very smallest fraction of fighting is just with regular Afghans who are going to fight foreign invaders as anyone with pride would. Bush needed Osama alive for a second term and the hysteria, rainbow colours of threat up and down, boogie man. Wouldn't have killed him even if he could have. Half hearted attempt early on at it. Now they would probably have liked to pull that one out of a hat 11h hour before election.
Jefferson
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 6:35 PM
As a Canadian I can give you a perspective on what the rest of the world thinks of Americans
You should ashamed to call yourself an American. I know of young Americans traveling abroad who display Canadian Flags on their backpacks to disguise their Americaness. There are still Americans who believe they live in the Greatest Country in the world. (it hasn't been that for a long time- if it ever was.) The World will not soon forget the Hypocrisy, and deciet and outright lies the current administration has spewed forth. Any sympathy that the world felt for the victims of 9/11 has long since evaporated by the 1000 fold revenge the US has taken out on Iraq and Iran if they had their way. America's house of cards is begining to dismantle. If they go bankrupt they will only have themselves to blaim. If they elect another Republican Government
after the Bush fiasco then the American electorate is beyond help.
Hawk
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:03 PM
Mr. Margolis:

It is not clear to me why you decry taxation of the wealthy. If not the wealthy, then who - the poor?

Instead of complaining about taxation, especially of the wealthy, which is a necessity for a civil society where people from all classes are given access to things like health care and education, I think it would be more productive to complain about where the tax money is being spent, like weapons of mass destruction, not to mention the billions spent on endless 'consultants'.
oldfan1
Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:25 PM
Better to elect the devils you know than ones you don't. Go McCain go Palin, go, go, go.
Sorry about your rogue republican status Mr. EM, you certainly have been languishing in the wilderness and there does not seem to be an end in sight.
hoTmaLe
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:28 AM
Where will USA lead to the humanity? Armageddon?
Paulie Girl
Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:34 PM
Paulie Girl
Thursday, October 30, 2008 4:35 PM
Paulie Girl
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:34 PM
I don't believe Colin Powell knew about all the lies at first, which is why he continued to play ball in the first term. When he realized that he was lied to, just like everyone else, he bailed. I also believe Powell to be so full of integrity that he leaves his actions up to each of us to interpret, instead of coming straight out and telling the nation and the world how his then-colleagues lied to him, too. A man of amazing character.
oldfan1
Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:45 PM
Paulie Girl says " A man of amazing character " about Colin Powell. Sorry to burst your fantasy bubble about your hero but he is known to have misrepresented himself on many occasions.
I am really trying to tone it down but in many circles your hero is known as a pathological liar.

Read on and you be the judge : http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id803/pg1/

Paulie Girl
Thursday, October 30, 2008 2:26 PM
Wow. Things I never knew I never knew. Thanks.
Desoc
Saturday, November 01, 2008 3:22 AM
I don't believe Powell to be as full of integrity as you do, and further comments, including yours, indicate that the man was not quite what the corporate US media made him out to be. But...he had a deep vested interest in not making an ass of himself in front of the whole world, and he did!

There's quite a bit of evidence that he was in fact duped on some of the things he said because he was kept out of the loop by his ennemies (Cheney, Dumsfeld, and their neo-con cabal). True, he should have been tougher and insisted that his experience dictated that the intelligence he was pushed to depend on was not 'safe', to insist on more convincing intelligence. And balk at being the dupe whose reputation (however false) for integrity made him the perfect (the only credible) voice of that administration to sell the Iraq war to the world.

He didn't come up to the desired level of integrity, but he was also duped.
LINCOLNSHIRE POACHER
Sunday, November 02, 2008 3:47 AM
How does not coming out with the truth about lies you told to the public you are supposed to serve (not the Israeli public I mean US public) make one "so full of integrity" and of "amazing character" ?? Gotta agree with Eric he must put his "integrity" aside and give explanation.
When he came out on side with Obama, I thought that's very good, but then remembered that he was that yellow cake guy, who cares what he says, he knew that was blarney, was still playing yes man and unable to figure where his loyalties lie. And if not, tell us all that he didn't know and have a good story to go along with it. The country should have gone riot at that whole thing, especially when Scooter Libbey got get out of jail free card. If I was Bush or Cheney I'd be scared of selling out the CIA like that, scared of getting retired or poisoned by a pretzel or something.
Hard Left Turn
Monday, November 03, 2008 12:55 PM
Dr. Alam is making statements that are clear, and make sense. As a long time reader of Mr. Margolis, I feel that the two critical issues We, as Canadians, all face are : We can all identify several problems related to our need to live next to the United States, as they are, and always will be, our neighbor. But, can We identify, and subsequently execute the solutions ?

The second problem is, and always has been : Can We then live with the consequences ?

We're spending a great deal of time trying to show our intellectual and political chops to elaborate on our understanding of the differences between Liberals, Conservatives, Democrats and Republicans.........and the vast array of subsets thereof.

Let's not confuse what this is with what it is called, or how it works.

It is a very complicated, horrible situation that is about to be given to a group of people to sort out. Drastic measures will be required to change the World, and despite all of the flaws that the Right Wing Media have so critically pointed out, Mr. Obama is far and away the best leader to have at the helm for the next several years. I forgive Him, and His administration, in advance, for the things that were held out as campaign promises. I expect Change in return.

Peace, HLT
There are currently 30 comments
Comments Commentaries Commentaries by Category