THEY CAN'T CAGE A SONG
August 14, 2010
George Orwell wrote, “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."
A true journalist’s job is to expose government wrongdoing and propaganda, skewer hypocrites and liars, and speak for those with no voice.  And wage war against mankind’s two worst scourges: nationalism and religious bigotry. 
 
I’ve always felt kinship for free thinkers, rebels, and heretics.
That’s why I am drawn to the plight of Private Bradley Manning who apparently believed Ernest Hemingway’s dictum: “Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.”
 
The 22-year old US Army intelligence analyst caused a worldwide furor by releasing to Wiki Leaks secret military logs that exposed ugly truths about the brutal conflict in Afghanistan, including widespread killing of civilians. 
 
To again quote Orwell, “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”
 
Manning also released a suppressed tape of a US Army helicopter gunship killing two Reuters journalists and a civilian. 
 
A civilian hacker employed by some shadowy US government intelligence “contractor” spying on the internet turned Manning in.   
 
Revenge was swift.  Manning was thrown into solitary confinement and faces a long prison term. His case recalls another courageous whistleblower, Israeli technician Mordechai Vanunu, who revealed Israel’s large nuclear arsenal, was kidnapped, served 17 years in solitary, and still remains a semi-prisoner.
 
Wiki Gate provoked a flood of bombastic pro-war propaganda from America’s mainstream (read: government guided) media, its rent-a-journalists, and Canada’s wannabe Republican neocons. 
 
Manning’s revelations were blamed on his being gay, a loner, or maladjusted.  The Soviets used to lock away such “anti-state elements” and dissenters in mental institutions.
 
Those with an interest in keeping the US military in Afghanistan tried to divert attention from Wiki Gate by trumpeting the plight of a wretched Afghan  girl whose nose had been cut off by her backwards tribal in-laws.  She was turned into a pro-war martyr.
 
This crime was immediately blamed without evidence on Taliban and served up as the reason why the Western powers had to garrison Afghanistan.  No pictures of Afghans blown to bits or maimed by US bombs were published. No mentions of oil and gas.
 
A few months ago, in response to Europe’s growing opposition to the Afghan War, CIA reportedly advised NATO the best way to keep marketing the Afghan War to the public was claiming it was a crusade to protect women’s rights.
 
Inconveniently, the US and NATO’s Afghan allies -  Tajiks, Uzbeks and Hazara - mistreat their women as badly as Taliban’s Pashtun.   
 
When I served in the US Army, we were taught that it was our duty to report up the chain of command all violations of the Geneva Conventions and war crimes.  These included killing civilians, torture, reprisals, and executions.
 
Manning reportedly sought to report to his superiors just such crimes committed in Afghanistan by some US forces and their local allies and mercenaries.
 
He was ignored. Just as was the courageous Canadian diplomat Richard Colvin when he warned Ottawa that prisoners were being handed over to the brutal Afghan secret police for torture and execution.  
 
Manning’s motivations for whistle-blowing matter not. What does matter is he revealed to the public the brutal nature of the colonial war in Afghanistan and the bodyguard of lies protecting it from public scrutiny. If Americans and Canadians really knew the truth of this resource-driven war, and its carefully concealed cost, they would end it very quickly.
 
 
I am reminded of the song from the great Harry Belafonte:  "You can cage the bird, but not the song!”
 
 
Twitter @ericmargolis
 
Copyright   Eric S. Margolis 2010
Neuville
Saturday, August 14, 2010 5:44 PM
As usual, right on the mark!
Kiterunner
Monday, August 16, 2010 1:04 PM
Do we realize how no one is talking about murders and atrocities comitted in Afghanistan - None of the so called politicia is talking about wikileaks and what was revealed but rather the FOCUS is at mosque AT GROUND ZERO and how American sensitives are being hurt. Anyone THINKING about the DEAD in Afghanistan or sensitives of their relatives??
Mike Smith
Saturday, August 14, 2010 6:43 PM
" If Americans and Canadians really knew the truth of this resource-driven war, and its carefully concealed cost, they would end it very quickly. "


I think that thought is a little optimistic


Both groups ( Americans being somewhat worse ) are only willing to go so far for this sort of crap unless it affects them directly.

Hell, rereading American Raj you can see the same unchecked pattern of behavior coming from the Americans for decades... and no real change

Obama was suppose to be the man of action to upturn the apple cart and set things right again
... and while he is likely better than what we would have seen from the McCain / Palin camp...
Perhaps we need Palin to be President, for things to get SO BAD that finally people will rise up and end this nonsense

and Canada and Europe passively going along with it, oh better send troops or the Americans will get upset, oh I know trade and jobs are valid reasons and things to protect... but there comes a point

The song has been playing for years, but nobody is humming along anymore

Tell me, do you like music

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8fI-dGWT74
Warren Metzler
Sunday, August 15, 2010 3:16 AM
I have an addition. I believe that a reporter's responsibility is to report the facts, and tell us given those facts where the situation is headed. To just give the facts, without giving a context, is the equivalent, in most cases, of misinformation.

I further suggest it is highly likely that Manning had nothing to do with any leak. How does a PFC, the lowest enlisted rank you can have for most people not long out of advanced training, get a top security clearance that gives him access to EVERY ARMY action record in Afghanistan for four years. Plus that video was an official video for the aviation unit that flew the helicopters. Why in the world would Army intelligence get an aviation unit video. And do you really believe that Army intelligence has access to State Department files of their embassy emails? I don't.

Do you actually believe that a person with the sophistication able to pull off collecting all the data, would than contact a perfect stranger and spill the beans. And do you believe it is just a coincidence that stranger just happened to be a person working for Army intelligence (oh, yes, I know, he was a "volunteer" who worked for a civilian group who just "voluntarily" keeps track of 250 million web site contacts and "shares" it with military intelligence). And to think that I thought American chivalry was dead? Stupid me!

I propose some high ranking persons, and definitely more than one, who are very upset with our shenanigans in Afghanistan, were the involved people.

I suspect, just as with 9/11, a "usual suspect" (a la Casablanca) was what we have here.
lo_sciacallo
Sunday, August 15, 2010 11:18 AM
Bullseye! Has anybody else ever noticed how these patsies are always loners, low-ranking agitator types with no direction in life, the skills of a toad, but are in possession of not only sensitive info, but the means to do the most damage possible to a country? They're usually caught in record time and convicted before they even see a lawyer, and they are always branded as traitors. Remarkable how that works.

This information that was leaked was a red herring, meant to "embarass" the gov't by exposing some "not too bad" activities that are long since history, as if to say, "See, we had a leak of some very sensitive info and there wasn't anything too bad there, right?". Balderdash!!

Let's see some real leaks and see how they reveal the truth about these criminals waging wars for monetary gain and imperialistic growth. Then I'll believe that Bradass89 brought down the gov't.
Archie Knaud
Sunday, August 15, 2010 7:22 AM
"Canada's wannabe Republican neocons"Thank you Eric that is well said.Canada has taken the wrong path. None in Steven Harper's Party may speak to the press without his approval regarding content??Canada is busy right now with creating new privately run prisons to go along with new tougher laws and mandatory sentencing.Soon we will all be very quiet indeed.The biggest crime regarding Afghanistan is that we think we can prevail.The more we pour in the more they pour in.We fight for "who knows what" and they fight for Allah.
Mike Smith
Monday, August 16, 2010 4:56 AM
I think they are fighting for more than Allah Archie,

they know the middlemen the US is using to form the " government " there are the same drug peddlers, warlords, murderers, rapists and scum that the Taliban initially came together to oppose

Any kind of central government there anytime soon is destined to require the use of force to the point there wouldn't be any coherent Afghanistan anymore anyway, you can't allow anyone faction to have any control over another if peace is the goal.

If right after the invasion, instead of vilifying the Taliban and trying to wipe out any resistance, if they simply went to each village and tribal leader and said, hey its your show. Can we offer some help... I think its likely we would have no war today. But a decentralized approach offers no control, and that was the point of the exercise anyway.


I too have problems with Harpers new justice system reforms, but not over mandatory sentencing or even tougher laws in some cases...

I think they are obsessed with the idea of punishment over rehabilitation in the prison system, they seem to want to build something like the American approach where somebody gets out and they are either a better criminal or woefully ill equipped to adjust back into society.

I am all for prison reform, it is badly needed...

but I think all Harpers boys are going to accomplish is more repeat violent offenders, more prison riots, and more expense
Bhorner
Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:43 AM
There are few things dumber than Canada fighting to protect American oil supplies in the Middle East while we are their number one supplier. Thankfully you have been informing Canadians through your columns of the foolishness of this war. It is with deep regret that I see that this is your last article for Sun Media. I hope that there are other venues readily available to Canadians in mainstream media in addition to your web page for people to read you as there is certainly a shortage of balanced views in the media.
ve3eoq
Sunday, August 15, 2010 3:41 PM
Sorry to hear you will no longer post in the Toronto Sun. I have always found your column to be the one to read if I had only the time/inclination to read one or a few articles. Guess I will have to continue to follow on your web site for now. Keep the faith.

Dave
carol
Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:54 AM
Dave - I'm with you -

So sorry to see Eric leaving the QMI Agency. Eric, you are one of the few voices of reason who can cut through the smoke and mirrors to the heart of the matter. You don't get bogged down in emotional-laden semi-factoids, but are able to step back and see the important principles at play.
I fell like I'm being left with right-wing idiologues writing half-truths for what passes for journalism.
You will be missed.

Carol
xdiesp
Sunday, August 15, 2010 3:53 PM
I had never read anything from you before, but after finding your defense of Wikileaks, I deeply respect your work. Every day I read everything there is to find on the matter, in gradual apprehension over the hundreds and hundreds of rabid commenters asking for Assange to be hunt and assassinated.

In so far, there have even been 2 completely made up facts to accuse him which make me fear the worst: ZDNet said he was blackmailing Amnesty, others claimed he put "hundreds" of Afghan informants when the truth is that only 3 names were out (one was a taliban spy, another was already dead).

The media spun it around in a metter of hours, conforming to the White House press report, and never came back. Even the most leftist blogs and papers: absurd, like no left was actually present in the country.
LadyBaBa
Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:31 PM
I can't seem to get registered?
LadyBaBa
Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:35 PM
Excuse me! I guess I am registered. We "talked" many years ago Eric - when you were almost a republican if not a republican. I am glad you are no longer at the Sun - don't think it was good for your reputation. I will follow you here because I think you are honest and hope you are honourable. Take care, Betty
Dave T
Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:14 AM
As much as The Sun is a Tabloid, Eric's articles always gave the paper its best hope for intellectual conversation. Now he's gone. Better still is the question why? Too expensive or too correct that the quasi minority government was beginning to feel too threatened, that they told the publisher to cease and desist. Remember that the first victim of war is the truth. Remember also that Eric was on CNN as an "informed" contributor, immediately after 9/11 and subsequently disappeared shortly after Bush moved into Iraq. Very interesting silencing techniques, by those who hate to hear the truth. Another question that American and Candian media shy away from, is why does everyone hate Americans? Should they ever get around to that one, then the catharsis will actually begin. Until then it will be one conflict after another.
ArmyDog
Sunday, August 15, 2010 10:30 PM
The major difference between Israeli technician Mordechai Vanunu and PFC Bradley Manning is that PFC Manning swore to protect/fight enemies of the United States both foreign and domestic upon his enlistment into the US Army. He broke his vow and committed treason. He deserves to spend the rest of his life in a military prison for putting innocent Afgan civilians along with American and coalition troops in danger.
Mike Smith
Sunday, August 15, 2010 11:45 PM
Perhaps he viewed his own government as one of those " domestic " enemies you are ranting about...


If he even acted alone, what Warren Metzler had to say makes more sense.

Too bad we never see government officials who break their vows, break the law, and break the faith with the troops at the sharp held to account.

Be several less conflicts out there if say a dozen ex senior US officials met the same gallows Saddam did

but hey, I am all for irony and justice
xdiesp
Monday, August 16, 2010 7:51 AM
US Army VS a 22 years old boy who didn't accept hiding war crimes. You want him dead.
I suggest you a good movie to watch tonight: Platoon.
Mike Smith
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:08 PM
xdiesp, if you were responding to my post please read it again,


I meant to suggest that high up members of the US government ought to be considered a domestic enemy and treated as such,

without the acts committed by Cheney, Rumsfeld , Wolfawitz, Madeline Albright, etc, etc
the wars we have today would not exist, hell 911 wouldn't have happened and so on.

If Saddam went to the gallows over gassing Kurdish rebels, then why allow the people who provided the gas, the delivery system, the planning and intelligence etc to go unpunished to commit more crimes?

The Americans really need to deal with the enemy within, or someday the rest of the world may finally get it sorted and come calling to find justice... and to hell with those who get in the way of that.
xdiesp
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:11 AM
Yes, I clicked the last Reply button on the page and it ended up looking as I was attacking your coomment. Sorry!
Dik
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:16 PM
Notwithstanding, and more important, he was upholding the American Constitution as well as many international laws. His superiors (?) should be dragged off to the Hague! Oh, I forgot, the US doesn't recognise the World Criminal Court....
Dik
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:17 PM
Stormcrow
Monday, August 16, 2010 8:05 AM
The War Hawks always speak of a 'clash of civilizations'.

I say 'what civilization?' A civilization needs a philosophy, and philosophers, and we no longer seem to have either. Technology has taken the place of reasoned enlightenment, and it's made our 'civilization' incredibly weak and undisciplined...and the survival prospects of the weak and undisciplined are realistically zero.

"If theology is an effort to construct a rational and systematic view of life out of the various and sometimes contradictory myths which are associated with a single religious tradition, philosophy carries the process one step further by seeking to dispense with the mythical basis altogether and resting its world-view entirely upon the ground of rational consistency."
Reinhold Niebuhr (1892–1971), U.S. theologian and historian.
lo_sciacallo
Friday, August 20, 2010 1:33 PM
Civilization is a great idea...we should try that soon. Just imagine what the world would look like if 'civilization' were a reality.
lord anthony
Monday, August 16, 2010 3:21 PM
Canada's wannabe Republican neocons.....

And Liberals and NDP and Greens.
It's been awfully quiet in Ottawa on the delivery-to-torture inquiry, hasn't it?
I'd have thought the oppositions would be yammering non-stop about this issue.
Mike Smith
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:10 PM
problem with any non stop attack is the public tends to tune things out after awhile if there is no actionable result...

perhaps when the next Wikidocs are released it may come up again
Dik
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:39 PM
I'm a bit concerned about Wikileaks getting 'cut off at the knees'... they have angered a lot of strong adversaries... with almost unlimited resources.
Mike Smith
Monday, August 16, 2010 6:57 PM
Hell after they intentionally bombed aljazeera offices it wouldn't surprise me at all

but maybe they figure better the enemy they know, if they drive folk like Assange underground I think it might increase the credibility of the media arrayed against them.


edit from wiki

Afghan War Diary
Main article: Afghan War Diary

In July 2010, Wikileaks released to The Guardian, The New York Times, and Der Spiegel over 92,000 documents related to the war in Afghanistan between 2004 and the end of 2009. The documents detail individual incidents including friendly fire and civilian casualties.[147] The scale of leak was described by Julian Assange as comparable to that of the Pentagon Papers in the 1970s. The documents were released to the public on July 25, 2010. On July 29, 2010 Wikileaks added a 1.4 GB "Insurance File" to the Afghan War Diary page. The file is AES encrypted and has been speculated to serve as insurance in case the WikiLeaks website or its spokesman Julian Assange are incapacitated, upon which the passphrase could be published (q.v.).[148]

About 15,000 of the 92,000 documents have not yet been released on Wikileaks, as the group is currently reviewing the documents to remove some of the sources of the information. Speaking to a group in London in August 2010, Assange said that the group will "absolutely" release the remaining documents. He stated that Wikileaks has requested help from the Pentagon and human-rights groups to help redact the names, but has not received any assistance. He also stated that Wikileaks is "not obligated to protect other people's soruces...unless it is from unjust retribution."[149]

According to a report on the Daily Beast website, the Obama administration has asked Britain, Germany and Australia among others to consider bringing criminal charges against Assange for the Afghan war leaks and to help limit Assange's travels across international borders.[150]
[edit] Upcoming
Spartadude
Monday, August 16, 2010 9:58 PM
I hate to say this but I can't believe I would have the courage to speak out like he has. He has now earned a lifetime of rejection and ridicule from the very office he pledged his life too....and what will change? Nothing. Because not enough others will do the same....it is sad.
Shazam
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:44 PM
Afghanistan has "newly" discovered (more like newly revealed) resources: 1.8 billion barrels of oil; by far the world's largest deposits of lithium; and of course the old stand-by, heroin that the Taliban banned - hmm, which international noses got out of joint over that domestic policy?

What's this about Eric no longer being published in the Sun newspaper chain? More repression and pandering to the organized elements repressing truths? This sadly reminds one of Conrad Black's decision to discontinue with Gwynne Dyer's external affairs column after Gwynne ran an article critical of Israel.
Mike Smith
Tuesday, August 17, 2010 11:41 PM
With the media becoming more and more politically polarized, it is starting to be that only in fiction people can express themselves and their feelings anymore.

V for Vendetta being one of the best movie example... I am sure the neocons hated that

or one of my favorite scifi shows

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZdiSeulZ8s&feature=related

I think the main character would have posted on wikileaks a bunch if it had existed on the show lol
lo_sciacallo
Friday, August 20, 2010 1:43 PM
The first noise out of anybody's mouth as soon as you criticize Israel for their crimes against Palestinians is "Anti-Semitic!".
It's entertaining to see the looks on people's faces when you tell them that the Palestinian people are ALSO Semitic people.
Justice123
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:14 AM
"If Americans and Canadians really knew the truth of this resource-driven war..."

I'm curious about what evidence exists that this is a resource driven war. Certainly, in the beginning the idea was to remove Al Quaeda and the Taliban from the country.

How does the author justify this assertion?
franc black
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:08 PM
How does the author justify this assertion?

By living, observing, reading, and sharing the results in published books and articles. All you have to do is access and read the material.

British Petroleum (www.bp.com) posts global energy statistics and resource flows with sources cited.

All of the information is ready for you. Are you ready for the information?
Justice123
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:41 PM
I'm always ready for the facts.

Where is the precise evidence of resources driving the motivation of NATO? Please point me to sources. Thank you.
Mike Smith
Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:09 AM
I'll allow franc black to address the resource question,

but let me ask you what the motivation of NATO is ?

to install a stable democratic government?

not by placing warlords, drug peddlers, and criminals in power so no

To defend womens rights?

but the guys they put in power either have the same or worse record on that issue so no
besides, the US "allies" in the Islamic world have either the same or worse record as well

To stop drugs from being exported ?

LMAO

Stop terrorism...

Worked real well didn't it, seems to have had the opposite effect

NATO I would say to appease the US

as for the US...

in case Franc doesn't get back to you


http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/chevronprogram/chevroninthenews/6571.html
franc black
Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:50 PM
Do you request 'precise evidence' in order to be sincerely informed, or are you asking for 'precise evidence' as an argument against the assertion that NATO's motivation is resource driven?

If you don't feel like reading (and I'm certainly not going to spoon feed you via this thread), maybe start with 'Green Zone', a popular entertainment product which presents, in a rather noisy way, the dynamics that we're discussing. Then declare which side you're on: truth seeker or bully apparatus (or other)...
Justice123
Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:28 PM
"Do you request 'precise evidence' in order to be sincerely informed, or are you asking for 'precise evidence' as an argument against the assertion that NATO's motivation is resource driven?"

The former. And I do like to read. I thought that the sources would be readily available.

Mike Smith
Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:15 PM
I did provide a source, and it stated alot of info...
Also one could use the info in the article to google further

no comments on that? pipelines and pipedreams? ( maybe a book title lol )

if you feel the resource argument is incorrect, what is your theory ?
GW
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 1:06 PM
First I would like to ask, are you familiar with the "TALL POPPY SYNDROME?"

Having Studied George Orwell's Novel, "Animal Farm" in High School, I NEVER thought I as an INDIVIDUAL would ever be subjected to such political ABUSE! I as an INDIVIDUAL had to defend myself for being a rather PROGESSIVE INDIVIDUAL in a community of NARROW MINDED bureaucrats who use everything/every one within their POWER to PUT ME OUT-OF-BUSINESS. Now at the age approaching 60, I have to rely on a rather small DISABILITY PENSION after starting MY SOLE-PROPRIETORSHIP at the age of 19, watching it grow with much HARD WORK, BLOOD, SWEAT and TEARS! MY REPUTATION has been RUINED, I have been beaten up by neighbours, WRONGFULLY CHARGED by local enforcement agencies and numerous times it has been suggested I relocate my residence and business outside of this municipality!

IS THIS NOT DISCRIMINATION?
Masdar
Thursday, August 19, 2010 6:48 PM
A true journalist’s job is to expose government wrongdoing and propaganda, skewer hypocrites and liars, and speak for those with no voice.  And wage war against mankind’s two worst scourges: nationalism and religious bigotry.  I could not agree more with the above statement. Unfortunately it seems the people that own and control most of the media do not wish the truth to seek the light of day and seem to do whatever they can to hide the truth from the people. We can be thankful for those investigate reporters who take their craft seriously and present the truth where and when they can. Although for the most part I fall in agreement with what Mr. Margolis writes I have on occasion shared a different view of events and take this as a mark of a free man who can agree to disagree. It is regretful that the Toronto Sun has pulled the shades on legitimate dissent however as long as the governments, don't place controls on the electronic press there will be a voice that will be heard.
lo_sciacallo
Friday, August 20, 2010 1:49 PM
Wait for it...hear that? That's the calm before the storm. One day soon, the Internet will be history and there will no longer be any way of receiving the truth from people like Eric M. That's when you know it's the beginning of the end of freedom in this part of the world. And it IS coming, bet on it.
Dik
Friday, August 20, 2010 8:04 AM
Wikigate is extraordinary...

Just a thought... maybe there have been lots of caged songs... that have never been heard and we are none the wiser?
Dik
Saturday, August 21, 2010 8:46 AM
It starts, and from the BBC, "Swedish authorities say they have issued an arrest warrant for Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, on accusations of rape and molestation.

The warrant was issued late on Friday, said Karin Rosander, communications head at Sweden's prosecutors' office."
Mike Smith
Saturday, August 21, 2010 1:04 PM
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2010/08/2010821153010551757.html


And hours later Swedish prosecutors withdraw the warrant,

no credible evidence they say


hmmmmmm a botched frame up job

good on Sweden for not playing along
Dik
Saturday, August 21, 2010 2:41 PM
The Swedish Prosecution Authority website said the chief prosecutor had come to the decision that Mr Assange was not suspected of rape but did not give any further explanation.
There are currently 45 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category