WELCOME MISTER PRESIDENT
January 19, 2009
Tomorrow’s inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama has more of the mood of a second coming than the investiture of a new president. Of course, the Bush administration, the most catastrophic in memory, is an easy act to follow.
 
Barack Hussein (the middle moniker that dares not speak its name)  Obama brings a bounty of hope, whereas the Bush administration brought fear-mongering, wars, flirtation with fascism, and financial ruin. 
 
Some 80% of Americans in a recent poll are strongly positive about Obama.   But once `the expected one’ Obama takes office, reality is going to set in and the euphoria will quickly dissipate as the young president confronts truly gargantuan problems and Washington’s powers that be assert their influence and bind him with a thousand cords.
 
Still, like most people, I am elated to see the last of the sinister Bush administration and welcome the new president, a man of dignity, intelligence and strength.  Tomorrow will be a majestic day for all Americans of color.  As an American (and a Canadian) I am awfully proud.  It’s been a long time since I felt good about my country. 
 
So all best wishes to our new president.  I would also suggest that one of his first official acts should be to immediately close the shameful Devil’s Island at Guantanamo, Cuba, and order this base, an embarrassing relic of 19th Century American imperialism, returned forthwith to Cuba.  His next step should be to ask Congress to end the hypocritical, idiotic 50-year embargo of Cuba.
 
I am just back from Cuba, and here follows my observations on its 50th anniversary of Communist rule. 
 
 
 
 
HAVANA –  The 50th anniversary of Fidel Castro’s revolution has been a very modest, low key affaire, totally out of keeping with this island’s normally boisterous fiestas.  Fidel remains gravely ill. He has been out of sight for the past two years, though he publishes news commentary from seclusion. 
 
Economically stricken Cuba is hanging on by its fingernails.  Life is grim and hard on this beautiful but impoverished island.  Food is rationed and scarce, public transport erratic, and blackouts common.  Many people living in decrepit apartment buildings must haul buckets of  water up numerous flights of stairs.
 
In the early 1950’s (an era how seemingly as remote as Ancient Egypt), my parents used to bring me to Havana each winter, and we often joined Ernest Hemingway and his mistress Pilar for daiquiris at its fabled `Floridita Bar.’  He was big, vivacious man with a white beard and a rumbling laugh.  I took an immediate liking to the famed writer, and he was very kind to me, telling me stories about the Spanish civil war and deep water fishing.   I still have one of his books,  inscribed, `to Eric, from his friend Ernest Hemingway, Havana, 1951.’
 
Eight years later,  a Communist lawyer named Fidel Castro Ruiz stormed ashore with 81 men to begin a guerilla war against the US-backed Batista dictatorship.  Cuba was then a virtual  American colony:  Americans owned 60% of Cuba’s farmland and industry.  But, contrary to Communist history, the island was not a wasteland of gangsters, prostitutes and oligarchs. It was the West Indies’ most developed, prosperous island with a well-developed middle class and a living standard that was near the top of Latin America’s.
 
On 1 January, 1959, Castro’s guerilla fighters arrived in Havana and proclaimed a revolutionary republic.  For the first time in its long history (Havana is 50-70 years older than  New York City), Cuba was genuinely independent of Spanish rule and American domination. 
 
Once Castro was in power, his comrade-in-arms, Ernesto `Che’ Guevera, today an icon of romantic revolution to the uninformed and juvenile,  ordered the execution of over 600 `bourgeois.’ Che then went off to the Congo to wage revolution but found cannibalism instead of a waiting proto-Marxist proletariat and was quickly run out of the chaotic country by the CIA.   
 
Undaunted, Che headed to Bolivia, where he got killed leading a farcically inept Marxist revolution.  That nation’s dirt poor peasants rejected Che and turned him in.  CIA’s famed agent, Felix Rodriguez, finished off Che. But, as Che rightly observed, `revolutionaries never die.’  His memory went on to live as a pop image on t-shirts and berets around the globe.   
 
Che’s fiascos notwithstanding, in an era when America bullied and exploited Latin America, and treated its people with contempt and scorn, Castro’s revolution was a triumph. His resistance to 50 years of US efforts to overthrow or assassinate him, and a near-lethal embargo, was epic.  Recall that this was the era when most of Latin American was ruled by US-backed military dictators or civilian oligarchs.  
 
US attempts to topple Castro nearly led to nuclear war with the USSR in 1962.   The Soviets rushed nuclear-tipped missiles into Cuba to thwart a planned US invasion.  The US imposed a naval blockade of Cuba and massed forces for an invasion.  Nuclear war was very close.  I was a student at Washington’s GeorgetownUniversity at the time and vividly recall how frightened we all were.
 
In the end, Moscow won the confrontation, though Americans were led to believe by White House spin, their media, and Hollywood that President John Kennedy was the victor. Moscow withdrew its missiles in exchange for the US agreeing never to invade Cuba and pulling its missiles out of Italy and Turkey.   Castro was saved by Moscow.  
 
In recent years, KGB veterans of the Cuban missile crisis have claimed that Castro begged Nikita Khrushchev to fire nuclear weapons at the US mainland.  Moscow refused. 
 
The cost of maintaining Cuba’s independence and dignity was  poverty,  dictatorship, and quickly becoming a Soviet satellite until the USSR collapsed in 1991. Today, only oil-rich Venezuela and Canadian tourists are keeping battered Cuba afloat.
 
Havana, once called `the naughtiest city on earth,’ is a museum of the 1950’s: decaying, melancholy, dark and depressing.      
 
Cuba has one of Latin America’s best medical and education system, and highest literacy.  But life in Cuba is punishing: food and power shortages, endless queuing, grinding poverty and constant supervision by secret policemen and Communist party  informers – in short, tropical Stalinism.    
 
Castro blames this misery on the US embargo.  The US blames Castro’s failed Stalinist economics for the mess. In fact, both are responsible. Cuba has suffered fifty years of the kind of pitiless collective punishment that Gaza has been experiencing, just in slower-motion.   
 
The US has maintained its crushing boycott under the laughable pretexts that Havana holds 200 political prisoners and is Communist.  Yet the US cheerfully deals with Communist China and Vietnam, and itself holds 36,000 Iraqi political prisoners, not to mention GuantanamoAmerica’s ally Israel holds 10,000 Palestinian political prisoners.
 
It’s high time the West Indies’ largest island was welcomed back to this hemisphere and given civilized treatment.  A recent poll showed that even 55% of Miami’s once fanatically anti-Castro Cubans now support ending the US embargo.
 
On an interesting side note, Fidel Castro used to warn black and mulatto Cubans, who are about 60% of the population, that the US was a deeply racist nation that hated blacks.  The election of Barack Obama has exploded that argument.  Cubans are just as agog over Obama as everyone else.
 
Chinese influence is moving into Cuba, and Russia is reasserting its strategic presence by rearming Cuba’s obsolete military forces.  So the US has little time to lose.
 
First Fidel, and now Raul Castro, have been happy to keep the US at arm’s length by provoking occasional crises.  An end to US-Cuban hostility could bring up to two million US tourists.  The creaky Communist control system could not withstand this invasion.  Nor could the Spartan tourist infrastructure.
 
Young Cubans are yearning for the kind of anti-Communist revolution that swept Eastern Europe.  So the Party, which refuses to implement Chinese-style reforms, may keep Cuba frozen in time.  
 
As I wrote from Havana eight years ago, there will be no major changes until  Fidel Castro, whom just about all Cubans regard as their nation’s beloved `papa,’  finally dies.
 
The age of  Yankee imperialism in Latin America is over.  Cuba raised the banner of revolt, and paid the price.  Now is the time for Cuba to rejoin the polity of Latin American democratic nations as a member in good standing.  America, I hope, will by now have learned to treat Cuba with dignity, respect and  economic restraint.
 
 
copyright Eric S. Margolis 2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SD
Monday, January 19, 2009 5:44 PM
I think once Fidel dies, Obama will need to move quickly to improve relations with Cuba. If the US doesn't, then China and Russia will. I think the US embargo will decrease incrementally--enough to satify the nay-sayers in the US, but able to pressure the Cuban government to change some of their ways one step at a time.
Dik
Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:46 PM
The present situation helps keep the 'ugly ones' away... might be OK to keep it in place.
Blueskies
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:57 AM
So we can add Ernest Hemmingway to the impressive list of people Mr. Margolis has known. Upon hearing some of his stories anyone not aware of Mr Margolis’ extraordinary life might consider him to be a liar or insane. I always enjoy his editorials and how they are enriched with his wealth of personal experiences and anecdotes.

Regarding Cuba, Castro probably does not have much time left and once he dies I consider it probable that US sanctions will lessen or cease and there will be major reforms in Cuba. Cuba might well take its former place as a very popular tourist destination for Americans. For this reason I think that property there would be an excellent investment but from my enquiries about a year ago it appears that foreigners are not allowed to own property. If anyone is aware of a loophole to this rule please let me know.
Rampart
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:21 AM
Musaddiq Virk
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:32 PM
That's exactly what they need!
rlott
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:33 PM
Calvin
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:04 PM
Calvin
As a Canadian, I couldn't be happier to see that stain on the Presidency gone. I think it's an unspoken fact that Bush was anti- Canadian. From the ban on ALL Canadian beef a few years ago, ( due to one sick cow), to the fact he barely visited Canada in his 8 miserable years in office. A little pay back for not joining his little Iraqi tea party? Well on behalf of Canada, I'd like to say: See ya, loser. As far as President Obama is concerned, I wish him well. It's going to take a monumental effort to undue the damages Bush wrought on the nation. Whereas I don't think President Obama is going to bring forth the miracles some seem to think he will, he sure as hell can't do any worse than the criminal Bush Administration.
Raz
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:10 PM
This article is about Cuba. The title "welcom mr. president" does not really represent the article.
topsy-turvy
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:34 AM
Mr. Obama can relate to Cuba becuase he seems to be a Communist. His father and mother were Communist and he's proud of his heritage
http://www.henrymakow.com/obamas_slip_revealed_his_true.html

Pastor Lindsey Williams said about Obama
The handlers around Obama are, for the most part, members of the Council on Foreign Relations. "The elite." "The globalists." They are essentially the same people who ran the Clinton administration and both Bush Administrations. "There will be absolutely no change in either our domestic or foreign policy.: the people who have looted this country will continue to loot this country. Regarding economic policies
Obama" will be another Hoover." In other words Obama will follow orders and will take the fall for the economic calamity that is about to unfold. (My note: Obama is another feckless, empty suit, who was selected, trained, groomed, packaged and sold to a gullible, naive and lazy American public.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2219026291450576553
Jefferson
Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:42 PM
Mr. Topsy Turvey, I can only surmize that you are an American from you comments. After the Crimes that have been purpetrated on behalf ot the American people for the last 8 years, there is something a lot worse than a Communist. Which political system has killed more people, devastated more lives, destroved more property in the last 20 or so years?( No it's not Israel- yet) Granted, the US hasn't approached USSR Stalin levels, but they don't have a record to be proud of . The US is the most Imperialistic country on the planet and the World will not soon forget the hipocrisy that they spew ( spin) Most Americans are clueless, brainwashed into thinking that they are the Hero's riding in with a White Hat on. It's going to take years and years to make the world forget , if ever. Good luck to Obama, let him give it a go, he can't do worse than the idiots that he's replacing
topsy-turvy
Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:38 PM
The US is the most Imperialistic Young country compare to British imperialism which behind Israelism UK older than US both are home of Marranos.
Communism is behind their Imperialism, Marranos handling it thru war and Plutocrats like Rothschild are financier of it and its HQ is in London.
Democracy is a pathetic charade to control each and every aspect of our lives, peoples don't care anything about war and politics as long as they have a car and jacuzzi at their homes means luxury which they adore ardently which makes 'em morally bankrupt.
I ain't american rather Muslim who is living in a fool paradise. are you?
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/911_a_hoax.htm
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:30 AM
As almost anyone interested knows that US spends a lot on the ARMY: Thus at least THERE is NOT going to be any CHANGE, which Obama promised as far as Military is concerned-
Which is perhaps what is most Wrong with US-Thus practically as far as foreign Policy is concerned-only appearances will change-nothing in substance will change.....
Some of it is :
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama reaffirmed on Tuesday his pledge to invest in the U.S. military and review major weapons programs, vowing to end abuses and cost overruns in the current defense procurement system.

The White House posted a list of defense priorities on its website shortly after Obama's inauguration, mentioning by name Boeing Co's C-17 transport aircraft and a multibillion dollar program to replace the Air Force's refueling planes.

The administration said it would build up special operations forces; expand the Army by 65,000 soldiers and the Marine Corps by 27,000; and end the current stop-loss policy.

Obama also stressed the need to renew U.S. alliances with other countries and strengthen them...... ...."

Read it all here:
Obama renews pledge to invest in military:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090120/pl_nm/us_obama_defense
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:16 AM
Maybe Obama can learn something from Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau.
Everyone who likes Pierre Trudeau, comes under attack from Right Wing Fascists, these days. Trudeau was no angel-but he was one of the best political culture has to offer:
1: he was an independent Thinker and wanted canada to be an Independent Humane Country-
2: smart and not shy to confront the US in a frank manner on issues that concern us all, like fairness etc
3: his main drawback was the slow approach he adopted towards western canada, i.e. he did not try hard enough to make western canada, friendly to the federal govtt.

I make no apology that I share many views with him, especially about modern,
overly aggressive and nosy militarism-Now the Harper Fascists and Co., are very hard on
US war resisters or dissenters. However it was different in Trudeau's view-
In the words of former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, who during the Vietnam War said “Canada should be a refuge from militarism.” As an aside it is disappointing to see that
his son, although seemingly smart lacks the boldness and courage of his father-
Dik
Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:49 PM
Trudeau was likely one of the worst PM's that Canada had... his damage may never be fixed. The only one that may have caused Canada more grief was John D....
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Monday, January 26, 2009 1:27 AM
Dik: Could you kindly give some Specific details or points, which indicate that Trudeau
did in fact cause Canada great damage? as you say- Thanks-
Rampart
Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:25 AM
I always wanted a Che-Che cap or t-shirt and Gawd knows I have looked and looked but no chance.

All I got was an Osama wristwatch for Rs50. It sez "I love you" with Osama's face in the background.

It also tells the time. Sort of.

Ugly watch... but I figured it would make me a millionaire when Osama is confirmed dead.
Paul W
Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:33 AM
Nicely pointed out Dr.Alam. Change will not come from America until the day it begins to reduce military spending. Just goes to prove that all Obama offers is hollow rhetoric.

In America's defence it may need that military for self preservation some day. When its debt moves "beyond the pale" and American society implodes economically you can expect the ultra nationalist politicians to come out of the closet to fix the problem. They'll fix it by stealing whatever they want from other countries. For that purpose they'll need an untouchable military.

Not a nice scenario for Canada which holds a great deal of America's debt. Hey sucking up to the big bully on the block and putting "business as usual" ahead of ethical issues has its price. Canada will get exactly what it deserves.
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Friday, January 23, 2009 1:36 AM
Subject: It is the duty of "global Community" to Educate Americans about the Impact of American Foreign Policy and their HUGE Military and their Spy agencies CIA etc...and all the combinations thereof:
This subject occurred to me as a very urgent Topic: Since yesterday I was shocked that Americans are divided over the closure of Guantanamo Fascist camp:viz,
"Americans are divided over closing Guantanamo, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corp poll released on Wednesday. The survey, carried out before Obama's inauguration, found that 51 percent said it should close, while 47 percent said it should stay open.
Last month, Portugal's foreign minister urged other Europeans to take in Guantanamo prisoners, saying such a move could make it easier for Obama to close the prison. Switzerland has said it is open to taking in prisoners.
The prison was established at a U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and the Bush administration's launch of the "war on terror." """"


1: The Propaganda words Democracy, human rights etc .. are frequently used but these are
seldom applied, if at all: One thing which distinguishes a democracy from fascism is the treatment
of people considered "enemies"-So americans should be taught respect for others and they cannot expect privileges which others are denied, for whatever reasons-If they choose not to accept this, They should declare themselves Fascists and spare us the endless diatribe that they are the best nation:

2: They should be taught give and take-while they expect others to compromise for "globalization" they act very isolated when they have to live up to their commitments-Bush refused to sign Kyoto accord, because american companies would suffer-They could go green and take a longer term viewpoint- The primitive coal industry has been dumping mercury in great lakes and there are many other examples of dumping. For example using, their waste uranium as depleted uranium in Iraq and afghanistan by using it in bombs-plus ewaste etc...God only knows what they dump in secret-!?

3: I am sorry to say from my experience that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely has shown up in Form of the American State-They got rid of the King of England-which was good-but now in terms of analogy the American State is like a Pharoah=a Ruthless, Arrogant,....
The American People should join the struggle to remove this problem of
'The Imbalance of power'

4:American State has set up a bad example which diligently Russia, EU [Including ex-imperial powers Britain, France etc...], India and China are diligently copying-Four of these states ARE a USELESS OPPOSITION in the security Council in the UN which is a Sham-They always punish Independent minded States in a variety of ways-The US citizens must, like us, learn the reality and consequences of stopping the aspirations of smaller countries- Even Russia that is earning money from Iran for building Civilian Nuclear Reactor is joining to impose sanctions.

5: It is surprising to me that most americans who claim to be christians are so war-mongering
zealots and support the fascists like the zionists-many Jews also see the zionists for what they are-Simply Slave of Power and Materialism-The answer may be simple:
The American Public is So selfish and Brain Washed by the "Media" that they have lost their sense of fair Play due to Fear?
They should educate themselves and learn from their bible about greed and avarice as sins-
Do on to others what you want them to do to you! For example: How would you like someone to keep adjusting their country interests to suit you, always? Just Think, please!
And imposing hand picked Leaders on you-Imagine President Mubarak, Karzai, Zardari,.....!


6: Learn the Hypocrisy of your State: For example India is a non-signatory of NPT yet it is constantly rewarded by the US, Russia, Britain, France, Canada who are dying to do business there-On one hand you claim that Muslim World is under-developed YET These States and related Instruments ARE DOING EVERYTHING TO FORCE MUSILM WORLD in THIS STATE-BY IMPOSING ALL KINDS OF RESTRICTIONS-Science and Technology is Key to "developing" not Hollywood Culture!
I have first hand experience of this-being told, after probing, from Siemens executive:
"It is not a matter of knowledge but politics and US and Western World Order is to deny
Technology to Muslim Countries-" This was his reply to my colorful comment, that using Siemens Technology it is possible to bring Afghanistan into the 22 nd century! instead of 21st,as Bush was repeating at that time-as a propaganda-
topsy-turvy
Friday, January 23, 2009 11:44 AM
Dr, Alam
That's what is going on we all see US as a savior of the world but reality is different they are rather servant of the money-makers like Rothschild-Rockefeller who create this money out of nothing in order to ensnares us in a web of debt. (current recession is an example)
I suspect that terrorism is being used to galvanize the US population in the interests of a hidden agenda(NWO) which is wrapped in Elders Protocols.
I'm afraid that soon people who defend cherished American values of democracy, individual freedom, equal opportunity and self reliance will be labeled "terrorists".
I'd like to see Osama bin Laden and Talebans destroyed. But I have a feeling that their crime partly consists in threatening the New World Order which is apparently diabolical dogma to destroy 4 pillar of mankind race, religion, nation/family and democracy.
The signs of subversion and tyranny are everywhere. Americans are in the elite globalist cross-hairs.They plan a new feudalism that will impoverish the middle classes, depopulate and enslave the masses, and leave only the rich served by a technocracy. The world increasingly will resemble a repressive third world country governed by the IMF, UN and World Bank.
US is a disposable instrument of the globalist agenda.
Paul W
Friday, January 23, 2009 11:53 PM
It isn't just Americans. The majority of westerners share the same views. They believe religiously in the myth that the West is good. So good that even when we do great harm westerners believe we didn't mean to do it so it doesn't count. Thus we have a myth that cannot be altered by facts. The dishonesty, hypocrisy and ignorance of all westerners - not just Americans - knows no limit.

The minority of westerners who see the reality of our actions is a select group. Select and powerless. Unfortunately education will change nothing. Their reality is worlds away from ours - practically another dimension. Sorry but the myth is unbreakable. We are good no matter what evil we do. Most humans do not have the introspection needed to change. They've been programmed for generations. You can't undo it. Western society will be good right up to the day it collapses. And it still won't be our fault!
Hawk
Saturday, January 24, 2009 9:39 PM
Paul W: No society or culture is any different. We are all parochial and pejudiced. Only individuals rise above this and they are marginilized or killed to protect the society's or culture's view of itself.
Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Monday, January 26, 2009 1:36 AM
Good points- Your point "Most humans do not have the introspection needed to change. They've been programmed for generations. " is only partially true. Unfortunately the big brain washing machine, Vision+Sound i.e. TV simultaneously impinging on our senses makes problem worse, and kills introspection-To break this cycle one must go into quiet cycles and think for oneself to break this vicious cycle-Why I say that it is only partly true?
Since we all have questions, and continuously examine and are drawn towards introspection-I have had many questions [I am just like most people] about all issues: religion, science, technology, ......But although it is natural to question and be introspective, unfortunately the fast pace of "modern" "western" life discourages this in a variety of ways one of which is the TV-
spokenword
Sunday, January 25, 2009 4:10 PM
First of all Mr. Margolis why don’t you come clean with your loyal responders that you are not an American – you are an American citizen, of which you became in the 90’s in order to avoid paying the revolting high Canadian taxes and be close to the Washington party circuit so you can do that tough investigative journalism.

What this reveals of course is your usual disingenuous modis operandi and to top it off you veer off from what appears to be a moment of sensitivity, not usually owned by right wing mental cases of your congratulating Mr. Obama (grudgingly I’m sure) and drift into Cuba/Castro/Che Guevera ….. your correct it was an American colony with Pepsi, Esso, William F. Buckleys family owning millions of acres….the corruption of Battista and his bribes, Mafia gambling interests etc etc etc …. It needed recalibration of its oppressed. And here you are maligning Mr. Guevera who helped in that fight of oppression and push back against your silver spoon capitalist elite comrades while you’re having mint juleps with Mr. Hemingway (spiked I’m sure). What have you done Mr. Margolis for humanity and balancing out the dynamics between the grunts and the elites – NOTHING … you’re on the oppressing side of the equation not the oppressed side …..its pretty easy writing pejorative BS of Mr. Guevera from the cushy confines of your corner office of your beloved corporation of Jamieson Vitamins. They have balls and are true men going up against the great satan of which you have none and on the manly man meter not even registering my friend….. this again only illustrates that you are at best a dilettante, which is not that unusual an occupation for a rich prick.


Prof. Dr. Sher Alam
Monday, January 26, 2009 1:42 AM
Spokenword:
Why be so abusive? You simply have the right to like Communism, just as Margolis has the right to like, whatever system. As long as nobody gets aggressive everyone has the right to choose his/her own system-Although I do not like monolithic communism, I do like Che Guevera fight against oppression-I also support Castro right to remain independent-Let us be civil and just present our viewpoints-
spokenword
Monday, January 26, 2009 11:12 AM
What's so abusive about calling out Mr. Margolis disingenuous American patriotism when he's a rich Canadian who was principally looking to become an American citizen to avoid paying high Canadian taxes - but now he's a proud American ....come on .... plus what's so abusive about calling out that he's a very rich man (inherited) and owns a large corporation, a rabid right winger and therefore naturally would not be too favourable to the likes of the Castros/Gueverras and any others who attempt to equalize and balance out wealth distribution and oppression. What's so abusive about saying that because he's a very rich man he's on the side of oppressing not being oppressed- thats just a fact. What's so abusive about calling him out that he's a journalistic dilettante. How can a rich dilettante have any credibility or be objective discussing the likes of Castro/Gueverra......and how can a rich dilettante have any credibility at all .....I don't think my response was abusive at all - its all fact - why don't you dig into Mr. Margolis's life a little deeper - what I'm revealing is all true.
There are currently 25 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category