WILL THE US REALLY PULL OUT OF IRAQ?
__ August 09, 2010
President Barack Obama just restated his vow to pull all US combat troops out of Iraq by August, 2010, and the remaining US garrison by the end of 2011. While campaigning for the presidency, Obama had promised to withdraw all US troops in 2010, but the Pentagon prevailed on him to extend the date.
Has America’s long goodbye to Iraq really begun? 
 
Perhaps. But don’t bet on it.
 
The 50,000 US troops left until 2011 will supposedly “advise and assist” and perform “anti-terrorism” missions and training. To this old war correspondent and military historian, that sounds an awful lot like the British Empires employment of native troops under white officers.
 
These remaining US troops will likely be six armor-heavy combat brigades, backed by warplanes from US air bases in the Gulf. A US brigade withdrawn from Iraq will go to neighboring Kuwait. Most of the rest will transfer to Afghanistan
 
No  word about the  fate of 85 ,000 US-paid mercenaries (aka “contractors”) in Iraq.
 
Under the current status of forces agreement between the US and Iraq, the US retains all air rights over Iraq. How long this will continue is uncertain. But it will be a key bellwether of Washington’s intentions since air power is the key to US military power around the globe.  Any Israeli attack on Iran would most likely pass through Iraqi air space.
 
In his impressive new book, “Oil,” writer Tom Bower notes America’s trinity is “God, guns and gasoline.” Iraq’s oil reserves are an estimated 112 billion barrels, the world’s second largest after Saudi Arabia. Canada ranks third.  Iraq also has vast natural gas reserves, an increasingly important fuel and raw material. Oil-hungry India and China are eying Iraq.
 
America’s once mighty oil firms, the “seven sisters,” have been elbowed out of most of the world’s oil fields by nationalist governments and replaced by state petroleum companies. Iraq’s ruler, Saddam Hussein, kicked US, British and French oil firms out of Iraq, and so sealed his fate. Big Oil moved back into Iraq behind invading US troops in 2003, and is  taking over Iraq’s oil production and exporting.  
 
The US does not yet need Iraq’s oil, but controlling it gives the US potent influence over its importers, such as China, India, Japan and Europe.   Control of Mideast oil remains a pillar of US geopolitical world power.
 
It seems unlikely the US will cut Iraq loose. Washington seems to be following the same control model set up in the 1920’s by the British Empire to secure Mesopotamia’s oil.  Namely: install a puppet ruler, create a native army to protect him, leave some British troops and strong RAF units in desert bases ready to bomb any miscreants who disturbed the Pax Brittanica – and keep cheap oil flowing.
 
Washington is buildings a US $740 million new embassy in Baghdad for 800 personnel, as well as giant new fortified embassies in Kabul and Islamabad, Pakistan(cost $1 billion) that may hold 1,000 “diplomats.”  Osama bin Laden calls them, “Crusader Fortresses.”
 
The US hopes the Shia Maliki regime it installed in Baghdad will keep a lid on Iraq while allowing almost independent Kurdistan to remain a Kuwait-like US protectorate. But given Iraq’s fractured history, this seems unlikely.   
 
American “liberation” left Iraq politically, economically, and socially shattered, `killed’ in the words of former foreign minister, Tariq Aziz. Republicans in the US crow about victory in Iraq thanks to the famous military “surge” advocated by John McCain, But this canard hides the grim truth. 
 
Reputable studies estimate Iraq’s death toll at mid-hundreds of thousands to one million, not counting claims by UN observers that 500,000 Iraqi children  died from disease as a result of the US-led embargo before 2003.
 
Four million Sunni Iraqis remain refugees, half abroad, victims of Shia ethnic cleansing. Death squads haunt the land.
Washington spends untold millions bribing Sunni fighters to lay down their arms.
 
Large numbers of Iraqis doctors and scientists have been murdered – many Iraqis believe, without any hard evidence, by Israel’s Mossad.  A maze of US-built concrete walls cut up and control major cities. Electricity only sputters a few hours daily  in 40 C heat. Cancers from depleted uranium fired by US cannon are becoming epidemic, as they are in Afghanistan
 
“They create a desert, and call it peace,” as Tacitus memorably said of Rome’s final solutions.
 
Iran, fearful of attack by the US, also played an important role in damping down resistance to the US occupation by ordering Iraq’s Shia militia, the Mehdi Army, to cease fire and temporarily cooperate with the Maliki regime. 
 
If all US troops are removed, the Maliki sock puppet regime won’t last long. A real  Iraqi regime nationalist would likely re-nationalize oil, rearm, rebuild the ruined nation and rejoin the Arab confrontation against Israel. Or,  Iran would  end up dominating much of oil-rich Shia Iraq.   It’s unlikely Washington would accept either outcome.  
 
Iraqi armed resistance to foreign occupation has abated as the pullout date nears. US casualties have fallen sharply because US troops are being kept on their bases. But this could quickly change. 
 
The highest-ranking surviving Ba’ath Party leader, Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, just declared a new push against the occupiers and their Shia allies.
 
The outlook for Iraq is probably more violence and turmoil. US troops may have to remain to protect America’s oil companies and prevent Iraq from disintegrating.
The excuse, of course, will be “fighting terrorism,” but the real reason, as in Afghanistan, will be oil which - of course,  is next to God.
 
Invading battered Iraq was easy. But getting out will probably prove far more difficult. US troops may have to remain there permanently. But that, of course, may also be part of Washington’s long-term plan for its Mideast Raj.
 
Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2010
         
Mike Smith
Monday, August 09, 2010 5:17 PM
" The US does not yet need Iraq’s oil, but controlling it gives the US potent influence over its importers, such as China, India, Japan and Europe. Control of Mideast oil remains a pillar of US geopolitical world power. "

I wonder how much this is also true of controlling the European governments, fearful of Russia becoming their only supplier kowtowing to the Americans to keep the oil flowing to them as well.

I cannot see any other reason for NATO to be in Afghanistan anymore... or for the EU not to be dropping the hammer on Israel with tariffs, sanctions, and outright boycotts.

Perhaps soon Russia will be seen as a lesser evil, and a better partner for Europe than the US... Russia has the raw resources Europe requires, and with money from those resources Russia could become a very big market for manufactured goods coming out of Europe.

An even better reason... who could be counted on as a partner to actually listen to the Europeans point of view... the Americans, or the Russians ? After two terms of " you are either with us or against us, pass the freedom fries Bush " and the continuing term of Obama the disappointment, I myself would rather have Putin as an friend, at least he would likely be less of an embarrassment, at most he would likely be my pick for a game of world leaders street hockey as well.


Perhaps the Americans will retreat to their forts in Iraq in preparation for an Israeli / American attack on Iran, as I said before... Iraq will rise against any government that would permit their airspace to be used for that purpose, so if the government want to survive it could be a race to get at the Americans left in country... I wonder about the effect of several Khartoum style massacres on American public opinion... could Petraeus be this century's Chinese Gordon ?
lo_sciacallo
Thursday, August 12, 2010 6:53 PM
Let us not forget that Putin is KGB to the bone. There is growing indication that he is aching for the good ol days. I don't trust this man as far as I can throw him. Caution would be wise when it comes to Russia.
Mike Smith
Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:34 PM
I would trust Putin farther than I would the Americans lately, Bush.. Obama.. Even Clinton... all had some very evil power behind the throne crap pushing them down a dark path. Any road but the one they want to go down would be better

when it comes down to it sometimes you need to choose the lesser of two evils

and at least with the economic benefits Russia would receive from a partnership with Europe, the Europeans would also gain a voice they do not have with the yahoos running the US. The Americans don't want partners, they want to tell everyone what to do. Russia would likely jump at being one voice among many to jump their economy.

Plus it would freeze out the US and their agenda, isolate them economically, etc

Might make the next inevitable financial crash more of a all American Affair... and as they refuse to cut spending, they bring that on themselves.
Eleanor Cowan
Monday, August 16, 2010 2:39 PM
I'm learning more about the inner workings of politics from reading Eric Marjolis and posts like yours, Mike. Thank you! www.eleanorcowan.ca
Cinderella
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:34 AM
US$740 billion for an embassy cannot be right by any means, probably Eric is thinking US$740 million which is still massive.

"Washington is buildings a US $740 billion new embassy in Baghdad for 800 personnel, as well as giant new fortified embassies in Kabul and Islamabad, Pakistan(cost $1 billion) that may hold 1,000 “diplomats.” Osama bin Laden calls them, “Crusader Fortresses.”"

Embassy costs and its pitfalls can be seen here http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article6888266.ece
philmar
Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:27 AM
As always, Eric sees the BIG picture - the Big Game as it is being played out before us. Forget the theatre that we see on CNN. Geopolitics is about power and money. Today oil still runs the economies of the world.
The U.S. is NOT leaving Iraq. It never left Germany, never left Japan, never left Cuba, never left Korea.....
Iraq is part of the imperial forces network of military posts.
iraq is too valuable and strategic to give up. Oil is the last cheap energy reserve we have. It fuels the industry and economies of the world. Without it Nazi Germany fell. the US will not give up controlling mid-east oil as this will ensure future Chinese and Indian dependence.
lo_sciacallo
Friday, August 20, 2010 1:09 PM
Nazi Germany never fell...it just changed venues. Look into "Operation Paperclip", and look at the list of names on the Apollo Mission to the moon...mostly Nazis transferred to the USA after WW2. No, the Nazis never fell,they just moved to the good ol' US of A.
Warren Metzler
Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:53 PM
I would like to suggest the following. The Bush family saw Sadam still being in power as the reason for daddy's lost in re-election. Which is poetic justice, since I suggest that daddy created Gulf Storm so as to ensure his re-election. And that is why we went there. Once there, the Pentagon mind-set took over; which is to run the world; and for that you need military bases every where. Yes, we like oil, but we don't need control of a country to get their oil; local companies aren't nearly as good as extracting that oil as the multi-nationals.

This mind-set of running the world in one of the major delusions this country suffers from, and will eventually bankrupt us. I don't know why the American people are so shallow and so scared, that they believe this world domination. But I'm convinced that no government can operated outside of the real mind-set of most of its citizens. And so most of us are responsible for this. Hopefully we will come to our senses before we collapse due to our excessive spending.
lo_sciacallo
Thursday, August 12, 2010 6:44 PM
The entire purpose for this exercise was to gain control over Iraqi oilfileds, they are going to live there as long as there is a marketable product seeping from the ground - or any other thing that seeps. You could say Iraq has become an American investment, everything is in place now to own that part of the world for as long as it is finacially viable.
Mike Smith
Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:39 PM
So in other words, stability will never eject the Americans...

True enough, just look at Okinawa

I suppose the only option for Iraqis who want the occupation to end is to target the oil patch, the port and pipeline facility's, and any foreigners they can get their hands on...

sounds like 1979 Iran

Speaking of Iran, bet any attack on them kicks of the next Iraqi civil war
Archie Knaud
Sunday, August 15, 2010 6:59 AM
Firstly,never trust Russia.Secondly, anyone remember the 1973 Israeli war and it's aftermath with regards to OPEC?Remember the oil embargo and the lineups at the pumps etc.?That lasted on and off for quite sometime.I pumped gas(BP) in Sydney Australia and we fought with customers to accept $2.00 gas per visit and turned many "non regular" customers away after they had waitied over an hour in a line up which stretched far down the road.To be fair we hoped America would do something. Five years later Iran takes the hostages.It was a good thing I was not the world's'"Boy King" because I would have pushed the button.In that respect America's response has been measured and predictable.The Arab world should have seen it coming.Don't pull on Superman's cape.
Dik
Sunday, August 15, 2010 11:22 AM
...and from the BBC, "The new commander of foreign forces in Afghanistan, Gen David Petraeus, says he will not be bound by a 2011 target date to start withdrawing US troops.

Speaking on NBC television, Gen Petraeus said he reserved the right to tell President Obama whether the pull-out date was too early.

He was speaking after US forces endured their deadliest month in July since the Afghan conflict began in 2001."

I wonder who's giving the orders...
There are currently 12 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category